Rhythm Control Of Atrial Fibrillation Research Articles

Digital twins for cardiac electrophysiology: state of the art and future challenges.

Cardiac arrhythmias remain amajor cause of death and disability. Current antiarrhythmic therapies are effective to only a limited extent, likely in large part due to their mechanism-independent approach. Precision cardiology aims to deliver targeted therapy for an individual patient to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects. In-silico digital twins have emerged as apromising strategy to realize the vision of precision cardiology. While there is no uniform definition of adigital twin, it typically employs digital tools, including simulations of mechanistic computer models, based on patient-specific clinical data to understand arrhythmia mechanisms and/or make clinically relevant predictions. Digital twins have become part of routine clinical practice in the setting of interventional cardiology, where commercially available services use digital twins to non-invasively determine the severity of stenosis (computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve). Although routine clinical application has not been achieved for cardiac arrhythmia management, significant progress towards digital twins for cardiac electrophysiology has been made in recent years. At the same time, significant technical and clinical challenges remain. This article provides ashort overview of the history of digital twins for cardiac electrophysiology, including recent applications for the prediction of sudden cardiac death risk and the tailoring of rhythm control in atrial fibrillation. The authors highlight the current challenges for routine clinical application and discuss how overcoming these challenges may allow digital twins to enable asignificant precision medicine-based advancement in cardiac arrhythmia management.

Flecainide sebagai Antiaritmia untuk Fibrilasi Atrium dan Aritmia Lainnya

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias globally, and its prevalence is projected to increase, including in Indonesia. AF progression is related to lower quality of life and less responsive to therapy or even becomes irreversible. The progression of AF is significantly slower with the rhythm control strategy than with the rate control strategy alone. The options for therapy in Indonesia are limited to amiodarone and propafenone. Amiodarone is one of the most common drugs prescribed for AF rhythm control, but associated with multiple organ toxicities, thus increasing the risk of multiple side effects, especially on long-term usage, potentially leading to drug discontinuation. Flecainide is an antiarrhythmia with a favourable effectiveness and safety profile, especially for AF management, used for acute cardioversion, long-term rhythm control, and as a therapeutic modality for AF with preexcitation syndrome. Flecainide is a potential drug to address the unmet needs of amiodarone as a long-term management for AF.

Greater distance between ablation lines reduces the recurrence rate after pulmonary vein isolation.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a recommended strategy for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF), but its success rate remains unsatisfactory. Continuous research is being conducted to explore new technologies and modifications to existing ablation workflow in order to mitigate the recurrence rate. This study aims to determine influence of distance between ablation lines on recurrence rate in patients undergoing first PVI and thus to optimize the procedure outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at tertiary care center in Poland. A total of 146 patients (median age: 62 years; 34.3% female) qualified for first PVI for either paroxysmal (n=103) or persistent (n=43) AF were evaluated. The procedures were performed with the use of a very-high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) catheter, QDot MicroTM (Biosense Webster) or conventional ablation-index-guided ThermoCool Smarttouch SF (AI-guided) catheter. Freedom from AF recurrence was used as a primary endpoint. The impact of inter-ablation line distance on the outcome of PVI, accounting for conventional risk factors was calculated. Greater distance between opposite circumferential PVI lines (DBL) and its ratio to transverse diameter of the left atrium (DLB/TD) was associated with lower risk of AF recurrence (HR: 0.966, 95% CI: 0.935-0.998 [per 1mm]; P = 0.04 and HR: 0.968, 95% CI: 0.944-0.993 [per 1%]; P = 0.01, respectively). Close PVI lines locations may contribute to AF recurrence thus increasing DBL and keeping higher DBL/TD ratio may be an advantageous ablation strategy.

Practical approach for atrial cardiomyopathy characterization in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes progressive structural and electrical changes in the atria that can be summarized within the general concept of atrial remodeling. In parallel, other clinical characteristics and comorbidities may also affect atrial tissue properties and make the atria susceptible to AF initiation and its long-term persistence. Overall, pathological atrial changes lead to atrial cardiomyopathy with important implications for rhythm control. Although there is general agreement on the role of the atrial substrate for successful rhythm control in AF, the current classification oversimplifies clinical management. The classification uses temporal criteria and does not establish a well-defined strategy to characterize the individual-specific degree of atrial cardiomyopathy. Better characterization of atrial cardiomyopathy may improve the decision-making process on the most appropriate therapeutic option. We review current scientific evidence and propose a practical characterization of the atrial substrate based on 3 evaluation steps starting with a clinical evaluation (step 1), then assess outpatient complementary data (step 2), and finally include information from advanced diagnostic tools (step 3). The information from each of the steps or a combination thereof can be used to classify AF patients in 4 stages of atrial cardiomyopathy, which we also use to estimate the success on effective rhythm control.

Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure.

Rhythm control therapy has shown great benefits for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of rhythm control on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory across the whole HF spectrum. Our study explored the prevalence and predictors of LVEF trajectory changes and their prognostic implications following rhythm control. Depending on the treatment strategy, the cohort was classified into rhythm and rate control groups. Alterations in HF types and LVEF trajectory were recorded. The observational endpoints were all-cause mortality and HF-related admission. Predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement in the rhythm control group were evaluated. After matching, the two groups had similar age [mean age (years): rhythm/rate control: 63.96/65.13] and gender [male: rhythm/rate control: n=228 (55.6%)/233 (56.8%)]. Based on baseline LVEF measurement, the post-matched cohort had 490 HF with preserved ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n=260/230; median LVEF: 58.00%/57.00%), 99 HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n=50/49; median LVEF: 45.00%/46.00%), and 231 HF with reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n=100/131; median LVEF: 32.50%/33.00%). Trajectory analysis found that the rhythm control group had a greater percentage of LVEF trajectory improvement than the rate control group [80 (53.3%) vs. 71 (39.4%), P=0.012]. Cox regression analysis also showed that the rhythm control group was more likely to have improved LVEF trajectory compared with the rate control group {hazard ratio [HR] 1.671 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.196-2.335], P=0.003}. In the survival analysis, the rhythm control group experienced significant lower risks of all-cause mortality [HR 0.600 (95% CI 0.366-0.983), P=0.043] and HF-related admission [HR 0.611 (95% CI 0.496-0.753), P<0.001]. In the rhythm control subgroup, E/e' [odds ratio (OR) 0.878 (95% CI 0.792-0.974), P = 0.014], left ventricular end-diastolic diameter [OR 0.874 (95% CI 0.777-0.983), P = 0.024], and CHA2DS2-VASc score (congestive HF, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, and sex category) [OR 0.647 (95% CI 0.438-0.955), P = 0.028] were identified as three independent predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement. Rhythm control is associated with improved LVEF trajectory and clinical outcomes and may thus be considered the optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with both HF and AF.

Inhibition of the KCa2 potassium channel in atrial fibrillation: a randomized phase 2 trial

Existing antiarrhythmic drugs to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) have incomplete efficacy, contraindications and adverse effects, including proarrhythmia. AP30663, an inhibitor of the KCa2 channel, has demonstrated AF efficacy in animals; however, its efficacy in humans with AF is unknown. Here we conducted a phase 2 trial in which patients with a current episode of AF lasting for 7 days or less were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of 3 or 5 mg kg−1 AP30663 or placebo. The trial was prematurely discontinued because of slow enrollment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The primary endpoint of the trial was cardioversion from AF to sinus rhythm within 90 min from the start of the infusion, analyzed with Bayesian statistics. Among 59 patients randomized and included in the efficacy analyses, the primary endpoint occurred in 42% (5 of 12), 55% (12 of 22) and 0% (0 of 25) of patients treated with 3 mg kg−1 AP30663, 5 mg kg−1 AP30663 or placebo, respectively. Both doses demonstrated more than 99.9% probability of superiority over placebo, surpassing the prespecified 95% threshold. The mean time to cardioversion, a secondary endpoint, was 47 (s.d. = 23) and 41 (s.d. = 24) minutes for 3 mg kg−1 and 5 mg kg−1 AP30663, respectively. AP30663 caused a transient increase in the QTcF interval, with a maximum mean effect of 37.7 ms for the 5 mg kg−1 dose. For both dose groups, no ventricular arrhythmias occurred and adverse event rates were comparable to the placebo group. AP30663 demonstrated AF cardioversion efficacy in patients with recent-onset AF episodes. KCa2 channel inhibition may be an attractive mechanism for rhythm control of AF that should be studied further in randomized trials. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04571385.

Rate Versus Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an arrhythmia characterized by disorganized atrial activity with an associated unevenly irregular ventricular response on an electrocardiogram. It is the most common sustained arrhythmia, with a lifetime risk of 25% in patients older than 40 years old. The incidence of AF increases with age and is associated with an increased risk for heart failure, stroke, adverse cardiac events, and dementia. The 2 main aims of AF treatment include anticoagulation for thromboembolism prophylaxis as well as rate vs rhythm control. The focus of this article will be on the treatment strategies in managing AF. Rate control refers to the use of atrioventricular nodal blocking medications, including beta blockers and calcium channel blockers, to maintain a goal heart rate. Rhythm control, on the other hand, refers to a treatment strategy focused on the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), cardioversion, and ablation to restore and to maintain a patient in sinus rhythm. Currently, the ideal treatment strategy remains greatly debated. Thus, we hope to compare the risks and benefits of rate to rhythm control to highlight how patients with AF are managed here at Kaiser Permanente Northern California.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.

Catheter ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is established as a mainstay in rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current practice and future perspectives in AF ablation. The main clinical benefit of AF ablation is the reduction of arrhythmia-related symptoms and improvement of quality of life. Catheter ablation of AF is recommended, in general, as a second-line therapy for patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF, who have failed or are intolerant to pharmacological therapy. In selected patients with heart failure and reduced left-ventricular fraction, catheter ablation was proven to reduce all-cause mortality. Also, optimal management of comorbidities can reduce AF recurrence after AF ablation; therefore, multimodal risk assessment and therapy are mandatory. To date, the primary ablation tool in widespread use is still single-tip catheter radiofrequency (RF) based ablation. Additionally, balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has gained prominence, especially due to its user-friendly nature and established safety and efficacy profile. So far, the cryoballoon (CB) is the most studied single-shot device. CB-based PVI is characterized by high efficiency, convincing success rates, and a beneficial safety profile. Recently, CB-PVI as a first-line therapy for AF was shown to be superior to pharmacological treatment in terms of efficacy and was shown to reduce progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF. In this context, CB-based PVI gains more and more importance as a first-line treatment choice. Non-thermal energy sources, namely pulsed-field ablation (PFA), have garnered attention due to their cardioselectivity. Although initially applied via a basket-like ablation tool, recent developments allow for point-by-point ablation, particularly with the advent of a novel lattice tip catheter.

Which Is Better? Rate Versus Rhythm Control in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The optimal approach to managing AF, specifically rate control versus rhythm control, remains a topic of debate in clinical practice. This systematic review aims to compare the rate control and rhythm control strategies based on their clinical outcomes, quality of life, and adverse events associated with them. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Research Gate, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Scopus, and Embase (Excerpta Medica dataBASE) databases. A total of 1657 research papers were identified through the search strategy, and after applying the eligibility criteria, 28 studies were selected for the analysis. The studies encompassed a range of methodologies, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for study selection, data extraction, and analysis. The outcomes of interest included all: cause mortality, stroke, bleeding events, cardiovascular hospitalizations, quality of life, and adverse effects of treatment. Data were synthesized and presented in tables, charts, and forest plots for meta-analysis where appropriate. The results indicate that both rate control and rhythm control strategies have their own merits and limitations, with the outcomes varying based on patient characteristics and comorbidities. While rhythm control strategies may lead to better symptom control and improved quality of life, rate control strategies maybe associated with lower risks of adverse events and complications. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding rate and rhythm control strategies in AF management, offering insights for clinical decision-making and highlighting the need for individualized treatment approaches.

Abstract 18056: Transhepatic and Trans-Patent Foramen Ovale Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Chronic Inferior Vena Cava Occlusion: Addressing Complex Anatomic Hurdles and Achieving Therapeutic Success

Background: Rhythm control for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the preferred approach for symptomatic patients, particularly those with reduced ejection fraction. Catheter ablation primarily consists of pulmonary vein isolation via a transseptal approach. In patients with chronic occlusion of inferior vena cava (IVC), surgical ligation of IVC, or congenital venous system abnormalities, conventional femoral venous access may not feasible. Case Report: A 78-year-old male with history of Hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, bilateral DVTs s/p thrombectomy, prior IVC stenting, presented with persistent, symptomatic AF on apixaban. Given a moderately reduced EF of 40-45%, amiodarone intolerance, and contraindication to other AADs, he was referred for catheter ablation. CT venogram showed chronically occluded IVC with patent hepatic veins, therefore transhepatic access to the right atrium was obtained. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was planned for transseptal puncture; however, this showed an incidental PFO. This PFO was easily engaged using a manual modification of a VersaCross transseptal sheath and after entering the left atrium, the sheath was exchanged with a bi-directional sheath (Vizigo). Using this single left atrial access, pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall isolation were performed. The transhepatic access site was closed with coil embolization to prevent track bleeding (figure 1). Conclusion: We present a case where successful AF ablation was achieved via percutaneous transhepatic approach, with improvised utilization of a conveniently located PFO. This was guided by pre-operative CT, and intra-operative TEE which allowed us to minimize any transseptal puncture related complications. The utilization of a multidisciplinary team comprising electrophysiologists, advanced imaging cardiologists and interventional radiologists is invaluable in executing complex procedures of this nature.

Abstract 12324: Current Trends in Anticoagulation, Referral and Utilization of Procedures for Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) can reduce quality of life and cause thromboembolic events, heart failure and death. Prior studies have identified disparities in the treatment of AF based on sex, race, and ethnicity. Hypothesis: There will be disparities in procedures for rhythm control (RC) based on sex, race and ethnicity. Methods: Cohorts of patients with new AF from 2016 to 2021 were identified with 1 year follow up to identify referrals, anticoagulant prescription, and procedures for RC. We calculated the proportion of patients with each outcome overall stratified by sex and race/ethnicity. We used logistic regression to compare outcomes across sex and race/ethnicity after adjustment for confounding variables. Results: We identified 2,919 patients with a new onset AF. The mean age: 68 years, 53% were male, 66% had Medicare, 69% self-identified as White, 23% as Black, and 3% as Hispanic. There was no difference in referral rates between men and women. Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to be referred to Cardiology and more likely to complete a visit. Prescription of anticoagulants was high (83%) and did not differ between men and women (84% vs. 82%, p = 0.65). Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to receive a prescription for anticoagulation (86% and 88% vs. 81%, p = 0.006). Women were significantly less likely to receive cardioversion or ablation compared to men (17% vs. 25%, p &lt; 0.001). Similarly, Blacks and Hispanics were significantly less likely to receive procedures compared to Whites (17% vs. 23%, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Despite equal attendance at Cardiology visits, women and Black or Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive cardioversion or ablation compared to men and Whites respectively.

Abstract 14992: Impact of Coronary Artery Disease on Rate vs. Rhythm-Control of Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that can impair quality of life and increase cardiovascular mortality. Previous studies have shown potentially better outcomes with rate-control agents in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Yet, optimal treatment of AF is not yet known. Methods: Leveraging data from the AFFIRM trial, we performed a post-hoc analysis examining outcome differences in patients on rate vs. rhythm-control agents, based on CAD status. The primary outcome was defined as death from any cause; secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and hospitalization after baseline. Univariate and multivariate modeling were used to determine risk factors associated with designated outcomes. Results: Of 4060 patients enrolled, 1551 patients had CAD at baseline. There were no differences in treatment randomization based on CAD status; however, more patients with CAD had worse heart function and comorbid CHF. More patients with CAD ultimately used some form of rate-control compared to those without. Overall, CAD patients were more likely to experience death (HR 2.08 [1.79-2.42], P&lt;0.001), specifically those on rhythm-control (HR 1.24 [1.01-1.52], P=0.04, Figure). CAD patients were also more likely to have ischemic stroke (HR 1.24 [1.00-1.53], P=0.05). When comparing CVD vs. non-CVD death, only CAD patients on rhythm-control exhibited a significantly higher rate of CVD death (HR 1.39 [1.03-1.89], P=0.03), while no differences in primary outcomes were noted for all other groups (P&gt;0.05, Figure). In multivariate modeling, the effect of treatment arm on risk of CVD death in CAD patients diminished upon accounting for age, smoking, rhythm at randomization, first episode of AF, CHF, and LVEF&lt;50% (HR 1.18 [0.93-1.50], P=0.17). Conclusions: AF patients with CAD on rhythm-control agents exhibited worse CVD outcomes, which may be more reflective of heart disease severity rather than treatment effects.

Abstract 17275: Clinical Outcomes Following Maze and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Procedures for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgeries: Insights From the National Readmission Database

Background: Maze procedure and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are often done as adjunctive procedures during mitral valve surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined the effect of the Maze procedure and LAAO on AF-related clinical outcomes. Methods: We identified patients with AF from the Nationwide Readmission Database who underwent mitral valve surgery in the years 2016-2019 using ICD 10 codes. Patients were grouped by procedure type (Maze+/LAAO+, Maze+/LAAO-, Maze-/LAAO+, Maze-/LAAO- (control)). Outcomes were in-hospital and 180-day readmission rate for stroke and mortality, and 180-day AF/atrial flutter readmission. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted adjusting for demographics, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and cardiac surgery type. Results: Of 14,979 patients with AF who underwent mitral valve surgery, adjunctive procedures were performed as follows: 2427 Maze+/LAAO+, 997 Maze+/LAAO-, 4052 Maze-/LAAO+, and 7503 Maze-/LAAO-. Stroke during the index admission and within 180 days occurred less frequently in the adjunctive procedure groups than in control group (2.5%, 2.3%, 3.4%, and 4.9% respectively, P&lt;0.001). Similar results were observed for in-hospital and 180-day mortality (3.9%, 7.6%, 4.8%, and 6.8% respectively, P&lt;0.001). However, readmission within 180 days for AF/atrial flutter was higher in the adjunctive procedure groups than the control group (5.6% vs 4.2% vs 5.4% vs 3.8%, P&lt;0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who had either Maze or LAAO procedures (Maze+/LAAO+, Maze+/LAAO-, Maze-/LAAO+) had a lower 180-day stroke risk when compared to the control group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.7, P=0.01; HR 0.66, P=0.55; and HR 0.79, P=0.01 respectively). Similarly, 180-day mortality was lower in patients who underwent LAAO compared to the control group (HR 0.71, P=0.002; HR 1.27, P=0.05; and HR 0.78, P=0.004 respectively). Conclusion: Patients with AF who underwent Maze and/or LAAO procedures during mitral valve surgery had lower 180-day stroke and mortality rates. There was a higher rate of readmission for AF/atrial flutter, which may be a short-term proarrhythmic effect of these procedures or may reflect differences in AF type and rhythm control goals in the control group.

Angiographic assessment of vein of Marshall in atrial fibrillation: Implications for identification and cannulation

BackgroundThe vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion improves rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). The identification and cannulation of the VOM can be technically challenging. This study aimed to assess the angiographic morphology of the VOM and investigate its value in the VOM ethanol infusion. MethodsPatients with AF (n = 162) scheduled for combined catheter ablation and VOM ethanol infusion were enrolled. The VOM morphologic features in the right anterior oblique (RAO), the left anterior oblique (LAO), and the LAO cranial views were analyzed. The impact of morphology on the identification and cannulation of the VOM was investigated. ResultsThe VOM was identified in 159 (98.1 %) and cannulated in 150 (92.6 %) patients. The VOM identification rate in the RAO and LAO/LAO cranial view was 97.3 % and 89.3 %, respectively. Of 134 patients with VOM identification in the LAO/LAO cranial view, 104 (77.6 %) had a VOM ostium clock location (VOMoClock) of ≤3 and 3–4 o'clock. The VOM cannulation success rate in the ≤3, 3–4, 4–5, and 5–6 o'clock groups was 100 %, 92.6 %, 88.5 %, and 77.8 %, respectively (p = 0.032). The median (interquartile range) cannulation time in the four groups was 10.5 (6.3), 12.0 (9.0), 13.0 (23.0), and 34.0 (30.0) minutes, respectively (p < 0.001). The diameter of the coronary sinus ostium in the RAO view and the VOMoClock were independent predictors for difficult cannulation. ConclusionsThe VOM morphologic features in different angiographic views provide valuable information which could facilitate the identification and cannulation of the VOM.

Effects of rhythm control on left atrial structure remodeling in atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The benefits of rhythm control for atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have not been conclusively determined. We assessed the effects of rhythm control on left atrial (LA) structure remodeling and prognosis in patients with AF and HFpEF. This was a retrospective, real-world, observational study involving patients diagnosed with AF and HFpEF. The cohort was divided into rhythm-control and rate-control groups depending on their treatment strategies. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for any cause, HF-related rehospitalization, and stroke. Differences in follow-up LA structure parameters were also analyzed. Compared to the rate-control group, patients in the rhythm-control group had a lower risk of HF-related rehospitalization even after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted HR 0.605, 95% CI 0.413-0.887, p = 0.010). Moreover, rhythm-control therapy led to marked reductions in LA echocardiographic indicators and a higher proportion of LA reverse remodeling (LARR). Rhythm-control therapy reverses LA structure remodeling and is associated with improved clinical outcomes; therefore, it is an optimal treatment approach for AF in HFpEF patients.

Effects of Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation on Cardiac Remodeling and Valvular Regurgitation in Patients with Heart Failure.

Previous studies investigating cardiac remodeling and functional regurgitation of rhythm control for atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of rhythm control for AF on cardiac remodeling and functional regurgitation in the spectrum of HF. Its effect on prognosis was explored. According to the treatment strategies of AF, the cohort was classified into the rhythm control and rate control groups. To further detect the implications of rhythm control on cardiac remodeling, functional regurgitation, and outcomes in HF subtypes, patients were further divided into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) subgroups. A total of 828 patients were enrolled, with 307 patients in the rhythm control group and 521 patients in the rate control group. Over a median follow-up time of 3.8 years, patients with rhythm control treatments experienced improvements in biatrial structure parameters, left ventricular ejection fraction, and functional regurgitation (mitral and tricuspid regurgitation) compared with rate control treatment (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that rhythm control reduced the risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.436 [95% CI, 0.218-0.871], p = 0.019) in HFpEF and HF-related admissions in HFrEF (HR 0.500 [95% CI, 0.330-0.757], p = 0.001) and HFpEF (HR 0.541 [95% CI, 0.407-0.720], p < 0.001); these associations were similar after adjusting for multiple confounders. Rhythm control therapy can be considered an appropriate treatment strategy for the management of AF in HF to improve cardiac remodeling, functional regurgitation, and prognosis.

Mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in patients on d,l-sotalol for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study

Use of d,l-sotalol for rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has raised safety concerns. Previous randomized studies are few and not designed for mortality outcome. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidences of mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in AF patients treated with d,l-sotalol for rhythm control vs matched control patients treated with cardioselective beta-blockers. This population-based cohort study included AF patients from the Swedish National Patient Registry (2006-2017) who underwent rhythm control after a second cardioversion. Incidence rates (IRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for mortality and a composite endpoint of cardiac arrest/death and ventricular arrhythmias were calculated for the overall cohort and a 1:1 propensity score matched cohort of d,l-sotalol vs beta-blocker treatment. Among patient treated with d,l-sotalol (n = 4987) and beta-blocker (n = 27,078) (mean follow-up 458 days), all-cause mortality was lower in patients treated with d,l-sotalol: IR 1.21; 95% confidence interval 0.95-1.52 vs 2.42 (2.26-2.60) deaths per 100 patient-years; aHR 0.66 (0.52-0.83). The difference in mortality persisted in the propensity score matched comparison (n = 4953 in each group): aHR 0.63 (0.48-0.86). No differences were observed in the composite outcome: IR in propensity cohorts 2.13 (1.78-2.52) vs 2.07 (1.73-2.53) events per 100 years; aHR 1.01 (0.78-1.29). There was no excess mortality with d,l-sotalol compared with cardioselective beta-blockers in patients undergoing rhythm control treatment for AF after a second cardioversion. Our results indicate that the risk associated with d,l-sotalol treatment for AF can be mitigated by careful patient selection and strict adherence to follow-up protocols.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of atrial functional mitral regurgitation in patients with atrial fibrillation or sinus rhythm.

Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, data on incident AFMR are scarce. We aimed to study the incidence, risk factors, and clinical significance of AFMR in AF or sinus rhythm (SR). Adults with new diagnosis of AF and adults in SR were identified. Patients with >mild MR at baseline, primary mitral disease, cardiomyopathy, left-sided valve disease, previous cardiac surgery, or with no follow-up echocardiogram were excluded. Diastolic dysfunction (DD) was indicated by ≥2/4 abnormal diastolic function parameters [mitral medial e', mitral medial E/e', tricuspid regurgitation velocity, left atrial volume index (LAVI)]. Overall, 1747 patients with AF and 29 623 in SR were included. Incidence rate of >mild AFMR was 2.6 per 100 person-year in new-onset AF and 0.7 per 100 person-year in SR, P < 0.001. AF remained associated with AFMR in a propensity score-matched analysis based on age, sex, and comorbidities between AF and SR [hazard ratio: 3.80 (95% confidence interval 3.04-4.76)]. Independent risk factors associated with incident AFMR were age ≥65 years, female sex, LAVI, and DD in both AF and SR, in addition to rate (vs. rhythm) control in AF. Incident AFMR was independently associated with all-cause death in both groups (both P < 0.001). AF conferred a three-fold increase in the risk of incident AFMR. DD, older age, left atrial size, and female sex were independent risk factors in both SR and AF, while rhythm control was protective. AFMR was universally associated with worse mortality.

Strategies for rate and rhythm control of atrial fibrillation in the ED.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common dysrhythmias managed in the ED and accounts for more than half a million visits a year in the United States. More than 6 out of 10 of these visits result in admissions. As the prevalence of AF has continued to increase in recent years, so has the presentation of patients with AF to the ED. For these reasons, clinicians in emergency settings must be knowledgeable of evidence-based rate and rhythm control strategies for stabilizing patients and preventing complications. This article discusses options, indications, contraindications, and safe implementation of rate and rhythm control strategies for ED clinicians. Recent studies have suggested that early rhythm control may benefit newly diagnosed patients, reducing stroke risk, cardiovascular deaths, and disease progression.

Short-term and long-term effects of cryoballoon ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first-line treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is an effective treatment for drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Whether CBA as a first-line treatment is superior in the rhythm control of AF than antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) remains unclear.CBA is superior to AAD as initial therapy for rhythm control of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation(PAF). A comprehensive database search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science from inception to March 22, 2023. Treatment efficacy was pooled using risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). This study was registered with Prospero (CRD42023401596).Five randomized-controlled trials involving 923 patients and an observational study were included in this study. The CBA group had a significantly lower overall recurrence rate than theAAD group (CBA vs.AAD: RR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.49-0.71, p < .05, I2  = 0). The incidence of persistent AF could be better controlled in the CBA group than in the AAD (CBA vs.AAD: RR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.06-0.49, p < .05, I2  = 0). CBA could improve the quality of life (QoL) of patients better than AAD (CBA vs.AAD: SMD = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.14-0.67, p < .05, I2  = 68.5%). CBA can reduce hospitalization rate significantly than AAD at 36-month follow-up (CBA vs.AAD: RR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.15-0.58, p < .05, I2  = 0%). Compared to AAD, CBA as first-line therapy could reduce the recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmia and incidence of persistent AF and improve QoL in PAF patients with lower incidences of hospitalization.